In honor of final exams week.
Disclaimer: Hypotheses in this essay are mostly conjecture and not vetted by the scientific community. Please use the original sources (in parenthetical citations) in your own research and contact the blog author with further question.
On a recent visit to the North Carolina Aquarium’s
nature trail at Pine Knoll Shores on the outer banks, I fell under the thrall
of an astonishingly vibrant lichen and after snapping an embarrassing number of
pictures immediately went in search of the name of this beauty. It did not take
much research to learn that this lichen was Pyrenula
cruenta, since, as Harris (1987)puts it, “Homo lichenologicus, like much of the
animal kingdom, is attracted to bright colors.” However, despite the ease with
which I discovered its identity, there was not much more to be found about the
habits and relations of this rather conspicuous lichen.
A lichen is a fungus that grows symbiotically with an
algae or cyanobacteria (see previous post), but most people know of them as
“that grey thing growing on that tree over there… wait, maybe that’s moss”. Those
who paid attention in high school biology might remember the crucial role
lichens played in the evolution of dark-colored moths in Europe during the
industrial revolution (link to Heidi’s Blog). But, for the most part, lichens are
not exactly well known- even the red ones.
Pyrenula
cruenta and Pyrenula
cruentata are bright red because they produce anthraquinone pigments (Brodo et al. 2001). Although these
are the only two red Pyrenula lichens,
lichens in this group often go by such appealing names as ‘rash lichens’ or ‘pox
lichens’ because they grow inside the top layer of a tree’s bark, causing it to
be slightly or vividly discolored with brown or black pimples.
Aptroot (2012) has recently
published a worldwide key that can be used to identify Pyrenula lichens- all you need is a microscope, a few chemicals,
and years of training as a lichenologist. After sorting through 745 potential
names, he pared the group down to 169 species, most of which are found in the
tropics. There are however, a handful of Pyrenula
lichens that seem to avoid tropical areas; for example, Pyrenula pseudobufonia lives in eastern North America and East Asia
and Pyrenula nitida lives in Europe.
My question was, why are most Pyrenula
lichens spread across the tropics, while some are only found in temperate
areas? I didn’t find an answer, but I did find a hypothesis.
The clues to a hypothesis come from who’s related to
whom and where these relatives live. Unfortunately, no one has worked out the Pyrenula family tree using genetic data, but those scientists who
have studied lichens intensively are able to propose which species may be
closely related based on physical characteristics. For example, Harris (1989)
believes that Pyrenula cruenta and Pyrenula cruetata are each other’s
closest relative. Not only are they both red, but the only other character that
differentiates them is how the cells in their spores are arranged (it is tempting
to conjecture that this trait is under simple genetic control, i.e. easily
mutated). Furthermore, Pyrenula cruentata only lives on the
southern tip of Florida and in the northwest Caribbean, a small subset of Pyrenula cruenta’s range, meaning that
it may have recently evolved from a Pyrenula
cruenta living in this area.
But, back to the main
question- where did the temperate Pyrenula
lichens come from? Both common and rare species of Pyrenula tend to be widely distributed across the tropics (Aptroot
2012) and in North America, the number of Pyrenula
species is highest in south Florida and declines northward (Harris 1989). This suggests
that Pyrenula originated in the tropics,
perhaps around the Tethys Ocean,
which wrapped around the equator during the Cretaceous, as has been suggested
for other lichens distributed across the tropics (Galloway 1991). However, Harris (1989) has
hypothesized that the Pyrenulaceae family of lichens, of which the Pyrenula are members, first evolved in the
northern hemisphere because some of the oldest members of this family occur in
the north, rather than the tropics.
So, here’s the hypothesis: Pyrenula lichens first evolved and diversified during the Cretaceous when
the world was tropical and the extensive coastlines around the Tethys Ocean
created widely dispersed maritime environments that these lichens seem to
prefer. When the climate later cooled, only a few of these lichens were able to
adapt and remain in the northern temperate regions.
One way to test this hypothesis would be to use
genetic data to construct a phylogenetic tree of who’s more closely related to
whom. A tropical origin for Pyrenula would be supported if the Pyrenula lichens that live in temperate
areas are younger species that have recently shared a common ancestor with a
tropical species.
The relatives of Pyrenula psuedobufonia provide some evidence that this hypothesis might be true. Harris (1987) believes that Pyrneula pseudobufonia is closely related to Pyrenula fetivica, Pyrenula nitidula[1], and Pyrenula cocoes, all of which have pantropical distributions (i.e. live all across the tropics). The existence of many other tropical Pyrenula lichens that are more distantly related means that this group probably has a tropical origin and that Pyrenula pseudobufonia has recently evolved to be able to live in the temperate zone. Pyrenula pseudobufonia’s closest relative is probably Pyrenula occidentalis which is found in the Pacific Northwest of the United States. But, these two species may have diverged from each other fairly recently since the only difference between them (other than where they live) is that Pyrenula occidentalis no longer produces lichexanthone, a chemical that fluoresces yellow when UV light is shined on it (in fact, this is how lichenologists tell the two species apart).
The relatives of Pyrenula psuedobufonia provide some evidence that this hypothesis might be true. Harris (1987) believes that Pyrneula pseudobufonia is closely related to Pyrenula fetivica, Pyrenula nitidula[1], and Pyrenula cocoes, all of which have pantropical distributions (i.e. live all across the tropics). The existence of many other tropical Pyrenula lichens that are more distantly related means that this group probably has a tropical origin and that Pyrenula pseudobufonia has recently evolved to be able to live in the temperate zone. Pyrenula pseudobufonia’s closest relative is probably Pyrenula occidentalis which is found in the Pacific Northwest of the United States. But, these two species may have diverged from each other fairly recently since the only difference between them (other than where they live) is that Pyrenula occidentalis no longer produces lichexanthone, a chemical that fluoresces yellow when UV light is shined on it (in fact, this is how lichenologists tell the two species apart).
The movement of ancestral species from the tropics
to the temperate zone and vice versa is a topic that biogeographers and
evolutionary biologists have been getting pretty excited about in recent years.
Many scientists believe that the explanation for why some parts of the world
have many species whereas others have few is substantially dependent on where
lineages of species originated and how they subsequently dispersed. A large
tropical group like Pyrenula that
includes several temperate species can be an intriguing system in which to
study such patterns and how they contribute to the geography of diversity.
Works Cited
Aptroot, A. 2012. A world key to the species of
Anthracothecium and Pyrenula. The Lichenologist 44:5–53. doi:
10.1017/S0024282911000624.
Brodo, M. I. M., M. S.
D. Sharnoff, and S. Sharnoff. 2001. Lichens of North America1st Printing. Yale
University Press.
Galloway, D. J. 1991.
Biogeographical relationships of Pacific tropical lichen floras. in D. J. Galloway, editor. Tropical Lichens: their Systematics, Conservation, and
Ecology. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Harris, R. C. 1987.
Some distinctive tropical pyrenolichens in the southeastern United States.
Evansia 4:28–30.
Harris, R. C. 1989. A
sketch of the family Pyrenulaceae (Melanommatales) in eastern North America.
Memoirs of the New York Botanical Garden 49:74–107.
[1] Harris (1987)
used the names Pyrenula citriformis
and Pyrenula plittii, which Aptroot
(2012) synonymized with Pyrenula fetivica
and Pyrenula nitidula.